Learn
A little clarity for your next decision.
Loading your learning library…
Investor WorkspaceWelcome, there!Log Out
Investor WorkspaceA little clarity for your next decision.
By Jerry Baker
REITs and bonds can both provide income, but they give you different rights to the money. A bond is a debt claim with stated payment terms, while common REIT shares are ownership interests with dividends that can change and no set date for returning your investment.
I would not choose between them by placing two yield numbers next to each other. First I want to know which bills the money needs to cover, when you might need the principal, and what could interrupt the payments. A higher number does not answer those questions.
A corporate bond issuer has a legal duty to make the payments required by the bond. Failure to pay can be a default. Bondholders generally rank ahead of common shareholders in claims against that issuer, but the exact priority depends on the debt and other claims. A legal promise is still exposed to the borrower's ability to pay. [1]
A common REIT shareholder participates in a real estate business. The company may own properties, finance real estate, or combine strategies. Its results depend on those assets, its costs, and its financing. This comparison mainly concerns equity REITs that own property, rather than mortgage REITs focused on loans and related securities. [2]
A REIT can issue both bonds and stock. Even then, the two investments are not interchangeable. One investor may lend to the company under a contract while another owns its residual equity. A successful year can increase shareholder value without giving the bondholder extra upside beyond the agreed terms.
I would also name the bond. A short Treasury security, a long corporate bond, and a lower-rated borrower do not present the same risk. “Bonds are safe” is too broad to build a spending plan around.
Many bonds have fixed coupons, but some have floating rates and others make no periodic cash interest payments. Maturity describes when principal is due, subject to the terms and default risk. It does not mean every bond pays the same amount of current income along the way. [1]
With a REIT, separate the last payment from a promise about next year. A quoted dividend yield may take the latest payment, multiply it into an annual amount, and divide by the current share price. That is a useful description of an assumption. It is not a contract requiring the company to repeat the payment.
Consider a purely hypothetical bond with $100,000 face value and a 4% annual coupon. It pays $4,000 each year under those assumed terms. If you buy it for $96,000, the cash coupon is still $4,000. Current yield is about 4.17% of your purchase price. If you pay $104,000, it is about 3.85%.
Yield to maturity also reflects the price paid, principal due, and timing of payments. Realizing a quoted compound return involves assumptions, including payments as scheduled and reinvestment of coupons. For a callable bond, examine yield to call and yield to worst as well. None of these measures promises a result if the issuer defaults. [3]
A REIT dividend yield and a bond's yield to maturity therefore do not measure identical things. Put the cash-payment schedule in one row and the full return assumptions in another. That simple separation can prevent a poor comparison.
Suppose a REIT pays $2 per share over a year. At a $40 price, that is a 5% cash yield. At $25, the same payment represents 8%. The business has not necessarily improved. Investors may be assigning a lower value to its future prospects.
If the annual payment then falls to $1.25, a buyer at $25 would receive 5% at that new rate. Someone who paid $40 would receive only 3.125% on that original cost. Those figures are made up to show the math, not to forecast a dividend cut.
Bond prices can fall too. A higher yield on a troubled issuer may reflect doubt about repayment. I would ask why the yield has risen before treating it as a bargain. A recent price, the correct security, and an explanation of the quoted yield are basic requirements.
Do not compare an old bond quote with a current REIT price, or a trailing REIT payment with a bond's future return estimate. Label the date and calculation beside each number. If the measures differ, explain the difference instead of hiding it in a footnote.
Duration helps estimate how sensitive a bond price is to changes in yield. Although stated in years, it is not simply time to maturity. Higher duration generally means a larger price response. The estimate has limits, especially for large rate changes or bonds whose cash flows can change. [4]
For a rough illustration, a portfolio with duration of six could fall about 6% if relevant yields rise one percentage point, holding other factors aside. On $100,000, that is about $6,000. This is a first-order estimate, not a guaranteed price move or a forecast of the year's total return.
Interest received, the passage of time, changes in credit quality, and the shape of the yield curve can all affect the actual result. A low duration also does not remove default risk. A short loan to a weak borrower is still a loan to a weak borrower.
For a REIT, higher financing costs can squeeze cash flow when debt resets or matures. The effect depends on its loan terms and when it needs to refinance. Read those details in the annual report rather than assuming every company feels a rate increase at once. [5]
REIT operating income may also change. Better rents could offset some costs; weaker leasing could make them worse. That makes a simple “rates up, REIT down by this amount” formula unreliable. Stress the business and the debt together.
A fixed dollar payment buys less when prices rise. If annual spending is $20,000 today and grows by an assumed 3% for ten years, the same purchases would cost about $26,878. A payment held at $20,000 would leave a gap of about $6,878 in that tenth year.
A REIT might raise rents as leases permit, but expenses can rise too. Lease length, tenant demand, renewal costs, and vacancies determine how much reaches investors. Owning buildings does not create an automatic inflation adjustment for the shareholder.
Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities, or TIPS, work differently. Their principal adjusts with a specified consumer-price index, and their fixed interest rate applies to that adjusted amount. At maturity, Treasury pays the adjusted principal or the original principal, whichever is greater. Market prices can still fluctuate before maturity; a secondary-market premium is not covered by that original-principal floor. [6]
For example, a hypothetical $100,000 adjusted principal that rises 3% becomes $103,000. A 1.5% annual coupon applied to that amount would equal $1,545 rather than $1,500, using a simplified full-year calculation. Actual payments depend on the index adjustments and payment dates.
TIPS are not the same as REITs with short leases. One uses an index-based contract. The other relies on a business successfully collecting enough rent after costs. Your household's own inflation may also differ from a broad price index.
A bond fund holds debt securities, and its value can change with interest rates, credit conditions, and repayments. Even a fund that holds only government bonds can lose market value. A fund's name should not replace a review of its portfolio and risk disclosures. [7]
An individual bond has its own maturity terms. A conventional ongoing bond fund usually replaces securities as its portfolio changes, so your shares do not have that same promised repayment date. A target-maturity fund has a planned wind-down structure, but that still is not a guarantee that each investor receives their original purchase amount.
Funds can make it easier to spread holdings across issuers and maintain a strategy. They also charge expenses, and the manager's choices matter. Individual bonds require attention to purchase prices, issuer risk, trading costs, and what to do when the money comes back.
I would ask whether you want a pool designed to maintain a certain exposure or specific contractual payments on specific dates. Both approaches can be useful. They solve different problems, and neither becomes suitable merely because its holdings are called bonds.
Suppose you expect to spend $25,000 in each of the next three years. Your plan should show where each year's money will come from. Buying shares that might be worth more in ten years does not by itself fund the first bill.
A carefully selected series of individual bond maturities can help match known cash needs, subject to repayment and other terms. For this illustration, face amounts of $25,000 due in years one, two, and three would provide $75,000 of scheduled principal. Their purchase costs may differ from face value, and interest would be handled separately.
That is a spending schedule, not a promise of a lifetime income stream. Once you spend principal, it no longer earns income. If you reinvest it, you do not yet know the rate available at that future date.
For a hypothetical $100,000 holding, a reinvestment rate falling from 5% to 3% would reduce annual interest from $5,000 to $3,000. The $2,000 difference needs a place in the household budget. A callable bond can return money earlier than expected and create that reinvestment problem sooner.
For REIT shares, there is generally no scheduled date when your investment is repaid. A planned sale to fund a bill depends on the market price and, for restricted shares, the available exit. Treat a hoped-for sale as an assumption, not a maturity.
Corporate bond interest generally is taxable. Interest on Treasury bills, notes, and bonds is subject to federal income tax but exempt from state and local income taxes. Some municipal bond interest is exempt from federal income tax, but the particular security and other tax rules matter. [8]
Municipal bond interest may also receive a state exemption in the investor's home state, depending on the bond and state law. Credit, call, and market risks still apply. A tax exemption does not insure principal, and not every payment connected with a municipal investment is tax-free. [9]
Here is a simplified tax comparison, ignoring state tax and other adjustments. A 5% taxable yield reduced by a 24% tax rate leaves 3.8%. A 3.5% federally tax-exempt yield has a taxable-equivalent yield of about 4.61% at that same rate: 3.5% divided by 76%.
At a 37% rate, that same 3.5% divided by 63% is about 5.56%. These examples show why the investor's tax position matters. They do not establish that one bond is better; maturity, credit, price, and call terms would also need to match.
REIT payments may be ordinary dividends, capital gain distributions, or return of capital. Their reported character affects current tax and basis. Eligible qualified REIT dividends can receive a Section 199A deduction subject to limits and requirements. Do not automatically apply the bond interest tax rate or a qualified-stock-dividend rate to the whole payment. [10] [11]
Have your tax adviser compare the specific holdings inside the account where you would own them. A taxable-account calculation is not automatically useful for an IRA. Tax treatment should refine the risk comparison, not replace it.
A small difference in advertised income can disappear after costs. On $200,000, an additional annual cost of 0.50% is $1,000. Ask which trading, fund, account, and advice charges are already reflected in the quoted number and which are still outside it. [12]
For an individual bond, request the total purchase price, including any markup or commission and accrued interest where applicable. Accrued interest is not the same thing as a fee. It reflects interest earned since the previous payment that can be settled between buyer and seller.
For a REIT, company costs affect cash available to shareholders even if there is no separate annual invoice in your brokerage account. A non-traded share class may add distribution or servicing charges. A fund holding REITs may add its own expenses.
Listed stock trading and a non-traded repurchase program are also different exit systems. Non-traded REIT requests can be limited, delayed, or suspended under the program's terms. A smooth account value on a statement does not establish ready access to cash. [13]
Before buying either investment, ask how a sale would happen, how the price is determined, and how quickly usable cash could reach your bank. I would keep money for an imminent expense out of a plan that needs every exit assumption to work perfectly.
Consider two hypothetical $100,000 investments. One receives $4,000 and ends the year worth $94,000. Its total result is a $2,000 loss, or 2%. Another receives $6,000 and ends worth $82,000. Its loss is $12,000, or 12%.
The second paid more cash. It did not deliver a better total return in that example. Neither case is a forecast for bonds or REITs. The exercise shows why an income table also needs an ending-value column.
Then test an interruption. If expected annual REIT cash is $12,000 and it falls by one quarter, the reduction is $3,000, or $250 a month. If an issuer misses a bond payment, the household may face a delay and possible loss instead. Different causes can create the same immediate problem: a bill still needs to be paid.
Diversifying can reduce reliance on one issuer or one asset type, but it does not guarantee against loss. Allocation depends on your time frame and ability to bear risk. There is no universal bond-to-REIT percentage that answers those questions for everyone. [14]
I would document the job of each holding. One might support a known spending date. Another might seek long-term growth and variable income. If a proposed investment only makes sense because it has the biggest displayed yield, the plan needs more work.
Take an investor who needs $2,000 a month from investments, or $24,000 a year. Suppose the draft plan expects $15,000 from bond payments and $9,000 from REIT dividends. The annual total matches the target, but that does not finish the plan.
First map the payment dates. Several bond coupons might arrive in the same two months, while household bills arrive every month. Keep enough accessible cash to bridge that timing gap. Include property tax, insurance, and other bills that arrive only once or twice a year in that calendar. Do not confuse a payment calendar problem with a poor annual return, or solve it by taking more risk than the budget requires.
Second, change the assumptions. If REIT cash falls from $9,000 to $6,000, expected income becomes $21,000. That is $3,000 below the goal. If a maturing bond also produces $2,000 less annual interest after reinvestment, the combined gap becomes $5,000. A reserve, lower spending, or another source of cash would need to cover it.
Third, name the source of any planned sale. Selling $5,000 of an investment produces spendable cash, but it is not a $5,000 dividend. It reduces the holding available for future income. There is nothing inherently wrong with a planned withdrawal of principal; the mistake is treating it as income that can continue without affecting the remaining assets.
Finally, test what happens if prices are down when the gap appears. If a position worth $100,000 falls to $80,000, a $5,000 withdrawal uses 6.25% of what remains. The same dollar withdrawal would have been 5% before the decline. The household decision and the market outcome interact.
I would write down the response before that happens. Which expenses could wait? How much reserve is available? Which holding was intended to fund withdrawals? Who checks that the plan still fits? That written process is more useful than a promise to stay calm when markets become uncomfortable. It also keeps the choice between REITs and bonds connected to the actual reason you wanted income in the first place.
No. Common REIT dividends can change. Bond interest is a contractual obligation under the security's terms, but an issuer can default. Neither should be described as guaranteed simply because payments have arrived in the past.
No. Even if the issuer pays face value at maturity, you may have paid a premium above it. A sale before maturity can occur at a loss, and default can reduce recovery. Check the price, terms, and credit risk.
No. Yields vary with the security, price, risk, and date. Compare equivalent measures and investigate why one is higher. A large yield can reflect weak credit, a falling share price, or assumptions about payments that may change.
Yes. Its market value can fall as interest rates change even when its holdings have very low credit risk. Owning fund shares is different from holding a specific Treasury security to its maturity.
No. TIPS have an index-based principal adjustment. A REIT must earn its way through changing rents, expenses, and financing. Either can have market-price risk, and neither perfectly matches every household's inflation.
Possibly, if each serves a clear purpose. Start with spending needs, other assets, taxes, and the losses you can handle. Mixing labels without reviewing the holdings does not create a complete income plan.
Educational information, not an offer or a personal tax, legal, or investment recommendation. Examples are hypothetical and omit stated adjustments. Tax treatment depends on your facts and current law. Review your transaction with your CPA, attorney, and qualified intermediary. Real estate investments can lose value and may be illiquid.
Enter your approved email to explore investments, save your shortlist, and keep learning.