Learn
A little clarity for your next decision.
Loading your learning library…
Investor WorkspaceWelcome, there!Log Out
Investor WorkspaceA little clarity for your next decision.
By Jerry Baker
A DST return should be measured by the cash an investor receives after investment-level costs, with the timing and final return of capital clearly shown. Fees can apply at purchase, during ownership, and at sale, so one advertised rate rarely tells the whole story. Compare like measures and trace each cost before deciding what a projected return means for you.
A presentation might show a cash-flow rate, an equity multiple, an average annual return, or an internal rate of return. Each answers a different question. None can be swapped for another without changing the meaning. A rate also needs a time period and a clear statement of which costs it includes.
For example, “5%” could refer to projected first-year distributions divided by investor equity. It might instead describe a property cap rate, which compares operating income with property value. Those two measures sit at different levels of the investment. Debt, fees, reserves, and other costs can separate them by a wide margin.
Ask for the definition in writing. Then ask whether the result is projected, realized, or a mix of actual cash and an estimated remaining value. A target return is a model output. A completed investment result uses what happened. A partly completed investment still depends on an estimate for the unsold interest.
The SEC encourages investors to ask about the full cost of buying, holding, and selling an investment, including how the professional is paid. Those questions are a good starting point, but a DST comparison also needs the actual offering's terms and cash flows. [1]
Organize the offering's costs into three periods: entry, ownership, and exit. Then list the recipient, calculation base, timing, and whether the amount is fixed or depends on results. This avoids treating all costs as one vague load.
Entry costs may include items such as sales compensation, acquisition compensation, organization expenses, financing costs, and reimbursements. During ownership, the documents may provide for property management, asset management, administration, and other charges. At exit, selling costs, loan charges, or disposition compensation may apply. Not every offering has each item.
The label alone is not enough. An acquisition fee paid to an affiliate differs from a third-party title bill, even though both use cash. A reserve is different again: it remains an asset of the investment until used, rather than being immediate compensation to someone else.
Ask where each item appears in the sources-and-uses schedule and forecast. A cost can be included in the opening price, paid later from cash, or both in different forms. The goal is to count every real cost once, not to add the same item twice because it appears in several sections.
A 1% fee on investor equity is not the same as a 1% fee on property value. A percentage of collected revenue differs from a percentage of scheduled rent. The base can matter as much as the rate.
Consider a hypothetical trust with a $20 million property and $10 million of investor equity. A 1% annual fee on equity would be $100,000. A 1% annual fee on the $20 million property value would be $200,000. If the rest of the facts were the same, the second fee would use twice as much cash.
Now consider a management charge of 3% of $2 million of collected revenue: $60,000. If someone described it as just 3% without naming the base, you could not compare it with either of the 1% charges above. These examples are arithmetic illustrations, not statements of normal DST fees.
Check whether the base changes over time. Does a fee use original cost, current value, revenue, or remaining equity? Is there a minimum dollar amount? Can expenses be reimbursed in addition to the fee? A simple list of percentages can miss all of those details.
Upfront costs mean that the full amount investors contribute may not become property purchase price. That does not mean every difference is a fee. Some cash may remain in reserves or pay necessary third-party costs. Separate the pieces before judging the total.
Use an intentionally simplified, all-cash example. Investors contribute $10 million. The trust spends $9 million on a property, $400,000 on documented entry fees and expenses, and keeps $600,000 in reserves. The full $10 million has a use, but only $9 million bought the building.
If the property later sells for the same $9 million and the full reserve remains, there would be $9.6 million before selling costs and any other obligations. That is $400,000 less than the original contribution. The opening costs still affect the outcome even though the property did not lose value.
If sale costs were hypothetically 2% of the property sale price, an unchanged $9 million sale would leave $8.82 million from the property. Adding the untouched $600,000 reserve gives $9.42 million. The total shortfall would be $580,000 before considering interim distributions, taxes, or any other change.
Continue the same example. To return the original $10 million from sale proceeds and the unchanged $600,000 reserve, net property sale proceeds would need to be $9.4 million. If selling costs equal 2% of the gross price, the required price is $9.4 million divided by 0.98, or about $9.592 million.
Compared with the $9 million purchase price, that is about 6.58% appreciation. This is only a capital-recovery calculation under the stated assumptions. It is not a required annual return, a prediction, or a complete performance result. Interim cash, reserve spending, debt, additional expenses, and taxes could change the answer.
This exercise is useful because it makes a hidden hurdle visible. It also shows why saying “the property only needs to get back to its purchase price” may be wrong for investors. Investors paid for more than the property's purchase price.
Do not apply this simple model directly to an actual exchange tax calculation. Whether an expense affects basis, proceeds, or taxable gain is a separate question. Have the tax preparer review the settlement and exchange records. Economic cost and tax treatment are related, but they are not interchangeable.
A recurring charge reduces cash each period in which it applies. Its effect depends on the cash available before that charge. A small percentage of assets can be a much larger percentage of the money that would otherwise reach investors.
Suppose a hypothetical investment has $700,000 available before a $100,000 annual trust-level charge. The remaining $600,000 represents 6% on $10 million of investor equity. Without that charge, the same pre-fee cash would represent 7%. The fee uses about 14.3% of that period's pre-fee cash, even though it is only 1% of equity.
That does not prove the service is overpriced. It frames the right questions: what service is provided, who performs it, what comparable choices cost, and what happens if results fall short? A lower fee for inadequate work can be costly too. The decision needs both price and substance.
Check whether the forecast already deducts the fee. If the stated distribution is net of the charge, subtracting it again would understate the projected cash. Ask for a line-by-line reconciliation rather than guessing from the marketing summary.
Identify which parties receive compensation and how they are related. The sponsor, manager, property operator, broker-dealer, lender, and other service providers may have different roles. Some may be affiliates. An affiliate arrangement is not automatically improper, but it can create incentives that deserve clear review.
Ask whether compensation increases when the offering sells more interests, uses more debt, buys a larger property, holds the asset longer, or sells it. Those incentives may differ from an investor's goal. Also ask which payments continue when distributions stop.
FINRA's private-placement guidance includes review of related-party transactions and payments, conflicts, material claims, and intended uses of proceeds. It also explains member firms' duties when recommending private placements. A disclosed fee does not replace the need to understand the recommendation and the customer's circumstances. [2]
Keep the conversation concrete. “How are you paid on this purchase?” is a reasonable question. So is “Are there other payment arrangements available for the services I need?” An answer should identify the actual arrangement, not merely say that fees are standard or that everyone charges them.
Cash-on-cash return compares a period's cash distributions with the stated equity base. A hypothetical $100,000 investment paying $5,000 over a full year has a 5% cash-on-cash rate on original equity. The measure can help with income planning.
It does not show the amount you will recover when the investment ends. It also does not prove that payments came entirely from current earnings. Ask whether the denominator is original equity, remaining capital, or some other amount. A change in that base can make a rate look different without changing the dollars received.
When a first-year rate is annualized from a short period, ask to see the actual dollars and dates. One payment multiplied by twelve is not a full year's operating record. Likewise, a temporary special payment should not become an assumed recurring rate.
Cash yield should sit beside a full capital-return analysis. An investment can distribute 5% and still lose money overall. If its final value falls enough, the interim cash may not make up the loss. A recurring payment is one part of return, not the whole return.
An equity multiple compares total cash returned with total equity invested, using the stated method. If an investor puts in $100,000 and receives $140,000 in total, the multiple is 1.40 times. That total includes returned capital as well as profit.
Assume there were no later contributions and the investment is fully sold. The profit is $40,000, not $140,000. If the total includes an estimated value for an unsold holding, it is not a fully realized result. Ask how that remaining value was established.
Timing is the main limitation. A 1.40 multiple over four years and the same multiple over ten years give the same total dollars but very different annual experiences. Neither number says whether the investor received cash along the way or waited until the end.
Do not average offering multiples without checking weights. A small successful investment and a large losing one can produce an attractive simple average while the total portfolio loses money. For a portfolio view, use the actual dollars contributed and returned, and preserve timing for an annualized measure.
The phrase average annual return can describe different calculations. One simple method divides total profit by original equity and then by years held. Under that method, $40,000 of profit on $100,000 over five years gives 8% a year: 40% divided by five.
That is not a compounded annual growth rate. If all $140,000 arrived at the end of year five and there were no interim payments, the compounded annual rate would be about 6.96%. It is the rate that grows $100,000 to $140,000 over five years.
If cash arrives during the hold, a single beginning-to-ending growth calculation does not capture the payment timing. Ask for the full schedule. A label without a formula leaves too much room for two people to believe they are comparing the same measure when they are not.
When reviewing past results, ask whether the start date is the property purchase, the offering launch, or the investor's actual closing date. The end date might be the property sale or the final investor payment. Those differences can affect annualized results, especially for short holds.
Internal rate of return, or IRR, is the discount rate that makes the present value of the listed cash inflows and outflows balance. In plain English, it uses both the amounts and their timing. An investor-level IRR should use investor-level cash after the costs included in its stated definition.
For a simple example, invest $100,000 today, receive $5,000 at each year-end for five years, and receive the original $100,000 back with the fifth payment. With those exact annual dates, the IRR is 5%. Total receipts are $125,000 and the equity multiple is 1.25 times.
Change the final capital payment to $80,000. Total receipts fall to $105,000, even though the annual payments were unchanged. The multiple becomes 1.05 times, and the IRR is about 1.09%. That is a very different result from describing the investment only as paying 5%.
IRR is still a summary, not a risk measure or a reinvestment promise. Unusual cash-flow patterns can also create calculation problems or multiple solutions. Review the underlying cash schedule, the exact dates, and the software method instead of treating one IRR number as a complete verdict.
Use the same starting amount, dates, and cost boundary when comparing alternatives. A property's unlevered return before sponsor costs cannot fairly be set beside an investor's leveraged return after all investment expenses. Both may be correct within their definitions, but they answer different questions.
Ask whether results include selling compensation, sponsor charges, property costs, loan costs, and exit expenses. Also ask whether any separate advisory or account fee applies to you. Personal taxes are often outside an investment-level return, and your tax result can differ from another investor's.
Compare at least a base case and a weaker case. Some fees may remain payable even when rent falls. A fee that seems modest in a strong year can consume more of a smaller cash pool in a weak year. Exit compensation may also change with the sale result under the actual terms.
Do not assume the lowest-fee offering is the best fit. Property quality, price, debt, rights, sponsor resources, and risk matter. The purpose of fee analysis is to understand what you pay and keep, not to replace investment analysis with a single cost ranking.
Check the payment order at sale as well. A charge paid before capital is returned affects investors differently from compensation earned only after stated hurdles. Read how those hurdles work, whether earlier payments count toward them, and which person has authority to resolve a calculation dispute. Do not infer the order from a chart.
A forecast can be carefully built and still miss the outcome. Realized results provide evidence about completed investments, but past performance does not establish what a new offering will do. Different properties, prices, debt, teams, and market conditions can produce different results.
Ask whether a track record includes all relevant offerings, including losses and longer holds. Read the method used to calculate returns. If the presentation excludes some investments, the reason should be clear. FINRA specifically highlights potentially misleading or selectively favorable past-performance claims as an area for investigation. [2]
Private-placement risks include limited liquidity and the possibility of losing the full amount invested. An estimate of net return does not remove those risks, and a Form D filing is not SEC approval of the offering. Use the actual documents and qualified advice before committing funds. [3]
A useful final worksheet has the fee map, cash schedule, return definitions, and open questions on separate pages. You should be able to explain where the dollars go and how each result was calculated. If you cannot, the next step is to clarify the figures, not to choose the largest number.
There is no single fee that describes every offering. Charges vary by structure, service, base, and timing. Compare the actual fee schedule in dollars and percentages, identify recipients, and check what is already included in the projected investor cash flows.
No uniform label guarantees that. Ask exactly which expenses the number includes and whether it is measured at the property, trust, or investor level. Separate projected cash yield from total return and confirm whether personal taxes or separate account fees are excluded.
No. A reserve remains investment cash until it is used, while a paid fee compensates a recipient. Both affect how much money initially buys property, but their later effects differ. Review how reserves can be used and what happens to any balance at exit.
Under the usual total-receipts definition, it means $1.40 returned for each $1 invested, including return of capital. It does not mean 40% each year. Check the holding period, payment dates, later contributions, fees, and whether any remaining value is estimated rather than realized.
A simple annual average can divide total profit by years without accounting for payment timing. IRR uses the cash schedule and dates. Ask for both formulas and the underlying figures; identical total receipts can produce different IRRs when their timing changes.
Yes. A final capital loss can exceed the payments received during ownership. Some distributions may also draw on reserves. Add the full net cash history and consider timing and taxes rather than treating each deposit as proof of a positive overall return.
No. That would count the same cost twice. First confirm which fees are included in the stated net result. Then add only costs that actually apply to you and are outside that calculation, such as a separately charged service if applicable.
Not by itself. Tax treatment and investment economics need separate review. Costs, property risks, debt, liquidity, and your goals still matter. Have your CPA assess the exchange tax outcome and compare the investment on a consistent net-to-investor basis.
Educational information, not an offer or a personal tax, legal, or investment recommendation. Examples are hypothetical and omit stated adjustments. Tax treatment depends on your facts and current law. Review your transaction with your CPA, attorney, and qualified intermediary. Real estate investments can lose value and may be illiquid.
Enter your approved email to explore investments, save your shortlist, and keep learning.