Learn
A little clarity for your next decision.
Loading your learning library…
Investor WorkspaceWelcome, there!Log Out
Investor WorkspaceA little clarity for your next decision.
By Jerry Baker
Mineral rights in different states can support a 1031 exchange, but the answer depends on the exact interest and the federal exchange rules. State law helps define what you own, how it is transferred, and whether it still exists. This guide explains key review points in Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, North Dakota, and Louisiana, without treating any state as a blanket approval.
A state-law question asks what rights the deed, lease, or court record gives you. A federal tax question asks how those rights are treated in your proposed exchange. They are connected, but one answer does not replace the other.
The federal real-property regulation recognizes specified property rights and, subject to its exclusions, property classified as real property under the law where it is located. It also excludes certain financial interests regardless of a state-law label. That prevents a simple shortcut such as “this state calls it real estate, so every product qualifies.” [1]
Section 1031 also requires qualifying business or investment use. Property held mainly for sale is excluded, and domestic and foreign real property are not like kind. Ownership structure, purpose, and transaction steps remain part of the review even when title is clear. [2]
Ask for a short title summary from local counsel and a separate exchange analysis from the tax adviser. The title summary should state the interest, duration, fraction, covered land and depths, and limits. The tax analysis should use those same facts. Two opinions based on different descriptions do not form one sound plan.
| State or setting | Review focus | Useful records |
|---|---|---|
| Texas | Severed rights and fixed versus floating royalty language | Full deeds, reservations, leases, and payment decimals |
| Oklahoma | Spacing, pooling orders, and participation choices | Commission orders, notices, elections, and leases |
| New Mexico | Private, state, or federal mineral ownership | County title records and the appropriate public-land records |
| North Dakota | Use, recorded claims, and dormant-interest procedures | County records, use history, claims, and notices |
| Louisiana | Type of mineral right and prescription of nonuse | Creating instrument, parish records, operations, and production history |
| Federal split estate | Whether the seller owns the minerals being offered | Original patent and federal master title plat |
This is a work list, not a ranking of states or an exhaustive statement of their laws. The sections below explain the sources behind it. The next step is to apply those sources to the actual property, not to copy a conclusion from another tract.
The Texas Railroad Commission explains that surface and mineral estates can be owned separately. Mineral ownership can also be split further. A purchase of land does not establish that the buyer receives every mineral right associated with it. Review reservations and prior transfers. [3]
Royalty wording deserves special care. In Hysaw v. Dawkins, the Texas Supreme Court reviewed language that could be read as either a fixed share of production or a share of whatever royalty a lease provides. The court read the instrument as a whole rather than using a mechanical multiplication rule. The 2016 case explains a method of interpretation; it does not decide every deed containing two fractions. [4]
Here is an original example of why the distinction matters. Assume one right is a fixed 1/16 of covered production. Assume a different right is one-half of the lease royalty, and that lease royalty is 1/4. The first right equals 6.25% of covered production. The second equals 12.5%. This assumes counsel has already confirmed those meanings; the arithmetic is not a way to interpret a disputed deed.
With $200,000 of relevant gross production proceeds, those fractions would produce $12,500 and $25,000 before any applicable costs or taxes. Neither is a forecast. The point is that one word in the ownership analysis can change the model far more than a small change in the commodity price.
For a Texas file, ask who has leasing rights, which bonuses or rentals are included, and whether the purchased royalty varies with future leases. Have counsel reconcile that answer with the decimal used by the payor. Do not rely on a sales summary that uses “mineral acres” and “royalty acres” as if they were the same measure.
Oklahoma's Corporation Commission describes a pooling process for interests within drilling and spacing units. The process can involve notice, a hearing, and choices about participation or compensation. That means a lease alone may not tell the full story of the rights and obligations tied to a tract. [5]
Ask for the relevant spacing and pooling orders, amendments, election records, and proof of notices. Identify the covered formation and the person who made each election. A new buyer should know whether a choice has already been made, whether a deadline remains open, and whether the interest carries costs.
Do not infer that every owner in the same unit has the same economic position. Your review should distinguish the royalty share from a working interest that helps pay for the well. Ask local counsel to explain the order's effect on the exact interest being sold and the documents that transfer it.
Make a simple chart with three columns: right received, cost owed, and decision-maker. Enter the answer from the order or lease, with its date. If a forecast assumes an owner has no drilling bill, that assumption should agree with this chart.
Pooling is also not a federal tax opinion. An order can help establish the rights at issue, but tax counsel still needs to determine what property you acquire. A commission record should not be described as approval of a 1031 exchange or of an investment's return.
New Mexico's Mining and Minerals Division says it does not administer or hold mineral-ownership information. Its guidance points readers toward county land records and title resources, the Bureau of Land Management for federal minerals, and the State Land Office for state-owned minerals. This is a useful reminder to match the question to the office that can answer it. [6]
Before ordering an income model, establish the ownership setting. Is the interest private mineral ownership, a right under a state lease, or an interest associated with federal minerals? Do the surface and minerals have different owners? Which instruments and approvals govern a transfer?
A well map is useful for locating an operation. It does not, on its own, show that the proposed seller owns the fraction being offered. Match the legal description to the title record and then connect that record to the well and revenue schedule.
For a portfolio crossing the Texas–New Mexico border, resist the urge to treat both sides as one set of legal terms. Keep separate state title reviews even if the wells target a similar formation. Similar geology does not make the transfer papers interchangeable.
Ask the closing team to list any consent, assignment, or recording steps that apply to the specific interest. Do not assume that paying for a private interest completes every public-land lease requirement. The responsible adviser should identify which steps apply and when they must be done.
The BLM describes split-estate land where the surface is privately owned but minerals were reserved to the United States. It directs owners to the original patent and master title plat to check those reservations. A private surface owner cannot sell federally reserved minerals simply because they lie beneath the owner's land. [7]
This issue can arise in western property research and deserves its own box on the title checklist. Ask whether the seller is transferring mineral ownership, a leasehold, an override, or only surface land. Those are different assets and may require different transfer documents.
Do not treat a federal mineral reservation as proof that no private energy interest can exist on the tract. Instead, trace the claimed interest to the instrument that created it. The question is what this seller owns and can transfer, not whether a map contains a federal color.
Keep the patent and relevant lease documents with the tax file. The federal exchange review should describe the same interest that the title specialist found. This is especially important when a proposal uses broad phrases such as “ownership of acreage” without explaining the underlying rights.
North Dakota has a statute addressing termination of certain severed mineral interests after a period of nonuse. Chapter 38-18.1 includes a twenty-year measure, qualifying uses, claim statements, notice requirements, and ways to respond. It should not be reduced to “no checks for twenty years means the minerals are gone.” [8]
The listed uses include more than production. Certain recorded leases, transfers, mortgages, pooling or unitization records, and claim statements can matter. The statute also has procedures tied to published notice. A title review needs the whole sequence, not a single date pulled from the oldest deed.
For a purchase, ask counsel to prepare a timeline with the claimed owner's records, relevant uses, notices, and responses. If the seller relies on succession from a former mineral owner, identify the supporting record. If a dispute exists, do not treat a pending title claim as settled ownership.
For an inherited interest, collect the documents that connect the current owner to the owner of record. Confirm the names and addresses used in the file. Old family correspondence can help identify missing records, but it does not replace the required legal documents.
The practical concern for an exchanger is timing. A title issue that might be resolved eventually may still prevent a sound purchase during your exchange period. Ask for the resolution plan before naming the interest as your only intended replacement.
Louisiana's Mineral Code uses its own terms. Article 18 describes a mineral right as an incorporeal immovable and applies registry rules to transactions affecting it. A reader familiar with another state's mineral deed should not assume that the same words describe the same legal structure in Louisiana. [9]
For mineral servitudes, Article 27 lists prescription from ten years of nonuse as one way the right can end. It also lists other grounds. That makes the nature and history of the right central to the review. It does not mean every mineral-related document expires ten years after it was signed. [10]
Article 29 addresses qualifying good-faith operations that interrupt nonuse. Article 36 addresses actual production and when the period begins anew after production ceases. Counsel must apply these and other relevant provisions to the facts, including the land and minerals covered. [11][12]
Ask for the act that created the right, its legal description, and a dated operations and production history. A payment schedule does not always explain what work occurred or which rights it preserved. Have the local adviser state what evidence supports the conclusion that the seller still owns the right being conveyed.
Keep royalty rights, mineral servitudes, and leases distinct in the file. Do not borrow a nonuse conclusion from one type of right and paste it onto another. The precise state-law interest then becomes the starting point for the separate federal exchange analysis.
State differences are easiest to understand when the investment sheet uses the same headings for every property. Show the interest type, fraction, title status, duration, existing production, deductions, control rights, and transfer conditions. Leave room for a source and an unresolved question.
Suppose two proposed purchases each cost $400,000. One has a clear payment decimal but a disputed depth limitation. The other has a clean depth description but requires a further assignment approval. Equal price does not make those closing risks equal. Ask which issue can be resolved, by whom, and with what evidence.
Separate facts from estimates on that sheet. A recorded deed is evidence of a conveyance. A lawyer's title conclusion is an interpretation of the record. A price forecast is an assumption about future markets. Giving each item its proper label helps everyone see what remains uncertain.
Use net cash attributable to the acquired interest when comparing income. Do not compare the gross revenue of an entire well in one state with the buyer's small royalty check in another. The number on the page should follow the actual ownership fraction all the way through the calculation.
A portfolio may contain many small interests. That can create a large file even when the investment is sold under one name. Ask for a schedule connecting each material asset to its state, county or parish, legal description, interest, and share of the portfolio's value.
Then decide how much of the projected income rests on the largest assets. A file with hundreds of small lines may still depend on a handful of wells. I would review the largest sources of revenue separately before relying on the number of properties as a sign of balance.
For example, assume a $900,000 purchase has three state allocations of $300,000 each. That is one-third of the purchase price per state. But if projected annual net cash is $36,000, $18,000, and $6,000, the shares of projected cash are 60%, 30%, and 10%. These are made-up figures before tax and sale results. Equal dollars by state do not mean equal exposure to lost income.
The same exercise can be run by operator, basin, product, or well vintage. Those groupings answer different questions. Use the one that tests the risk you are concerned about instead of assuming state lines provide all the diversification you need.
A delayed exchange generally allows 45 days to identify replacement property. Receipt must occur by the earlier of 180 days or the return due date, including extensions. The rules also require an unambiguous description and impose limits on identifying multiple properties. A state-law review does not pause those federal clocks. [13]
Give the intermediary and tax counsel the full proposed asset schedule early. Ask how the separate mineral interests will be described and counted. A portfolio name alone may not answer those questions. Check that what is delivered is the property that was properly identified.
Set working dates for title objections, signatures, assignments, funds, and any required approvals. Ask the closing team to confirm what must occur for the intended transfer to be complete. A wire sent on time cannot cure a purchase of rights the seller did not own.
Use backups that have also been reviewed. The value of a backup is that it can be completed if needed, not that its name fits on a list. Do not let a looming tax deadline turn an unresolved title issue into a supposedly minor detail.
Where an asset is located and where its owner lives are separate facts to give the CPA. Ask which states require returns, whether withholding applies, how depletion is treated, and how the proposed exchange affects state basis. This guide does not assign tax rates or determine any owner's filing duties.
Also ask whether a later move changes the analysis. An investment held through a trust or entity may require different reporting from a directly owned right. Do not assume that a federal deferral conclusion answers every state question.
Keep a state-by-state basis schedule with the closing records. The practical goal is simple: the person preparing a return years from now should be able to see what was bought, how the cost was allocated, and which amounts were carried forward. That record is much easier to build at closing than to recreate after a sale.
Local counsel should identify the rights and any title defects. Tax counsel should address exchange eligibility using that description. The intermediary should coordinate exchange mechanics. The investment review should test the cash flow and costs. Each role needs the same final asset schedule.
Ask every adviser to state the limits of the work. A production-data check does not replace title review. A title review does not value the reserves. A tax opinion does not promise an investment return. Naming these boundaries makes gaps visible before funds move.
When a fact changes, update the whole team. Removing one tract can change the value allocation, the income model, and the identified property. A revised royalty fraction can affect price as well as title. Keep a dated version of the final schedule so everyone works from the same deal.
There is no useful blanket list that approves every interest in a state. Federal rules apply to the specific property and transaction, while local law helps define the rights. Review the interest rather than treating the state name as an eligibility certificate. [1]
Potentially. Crossing a state line does not itself defeat a qualifying domestic real-property exchange. The exact rights, business or investment purpose, ownership, and exchange steps must still qualify. Have advisers review both the property being sold and the replacement. [2]
One may be a fixed share of production; another may vary with the lease royalty. The full instrument controls the legal interpretation. Arithmetic comes after that interpretation, not before it. Hysaw illustrates why courts examine the language in context. [4]
No. It may help establish rights, choices, and obligations associated with the unit. Your tax adviser must still evaluate what property the buyer acquires and whether the exchange rules are met. Obtain the actual order and relevant elections rather than relying on a general description of pooling. [5]
Not necessarily. Rights may have been separated, and some lands have federal mineral reservations. Check the chain of title and any relevant patent or public-land records. Do not include mineral value in a sale merely because the minerals lie below land you own. [3][7]
No such shortcut is reliable. The statute includes qualifying uses, recorded claims, notices, and response procedures. Counsel must review the actual history. A long gap in royalty checks alone does not answer whether the interest survives. [8]
No. Identify the type of right first. Mineral-servitude rules address nonuse and events that interrupt it, along with other grounds for extinction. Applying only a ten-year number without the creating document and history can produce the wrong result. [10][11][12]
A reconciled asset schedule can connect the legal descriptions, ownership shares, state-law review, exchange identification, price allocation, and income model. It does not replace the underlying documents. It gives each adviser a clear way to confirm that everyone is reviewing the same rights.
Educational information, not an offer or a personal tax, legal, or investment recommendation. Examples are hypothetical and omit stated adjustments. Tax treatment depends on your facts and current law. Review your transaction with your CPA, attorney, and qualified intermediary. Real estate investments can lose value and may be illiquid.
Enter your approved email to explore investments, save your shortlist, and keep learning.